Can’t You See It’s a Scam?! Mar.20.2012

Note: to the best of my knowledge this will be the last time I talk about Mass Effect 3 before actually playing it. Never mind. See here.

So…

ME3 is set to go down in history as having the most controversial ending in videogame history. Or something like that. The reason, according to BioWare, is to “get people talking”. In fact people have been talking about it so much that I consider the fact that I still don’t know how it ends to be my greatest achievement (I’m not a very high achiever).

There has even been a petition to get the ending changed. And BioWare seem to be listening.

Err, shouldn’t this be arousing suspicion?

Until learning that BioWare are (claiming to be) considering changing the ending in order to please fans I was operating under the theory that the reason they wanted people talking was to force gamers into purchasing part 3 as soon as possible in order to avoid spoilers.

But lets just break this down. There are three things fans have complained about regarding Mass Effect 3:

  1. The requirement for PC gamers to install spyware with their game
  2. The requirement to purchase a fuckload of DLC in order to get the whole story
  3. The ending

Two of these complaints are reasonable. BioWare and EA are (claiming to be) listening to the other one.

For crying out loud people, they are playing us! They aren’t listening to fans! They don’t care about us! The purpose of this controversial ending was the campaign to get it changed all along. They know what fans are like. They want people petitioning so they can create yet another piece of DLC that idiots will pay for, all the while keeping up the pretence of giving a crap about anything other than profit!

Don’t be taken in by their bullshit. All gamer suffer when you do.

Update: Something else has occurred to me. Although people have now jumped on the campaign bandwagon are we even certain the initial petitioners actually exist? After all, it wouldn’t be the first time EA has paid people to pretend to be outraged at one of its games for the sake of publicity.

The Piracy Quandary Mar.15.2012

My name is Arol, and I support videogame piracy.

To clarify, I don’t support piracy as a blanket option for those too cheap to pay for their games – the precious few companies that actually look out for their customers deserve every penny they make. I support piracy in individual cases where gamers are left without a reasonable legal alternative.

I wholeheartedly believe that if a company doesn’t make their games readily available for legal purchase then they have no business getting their knickers in a twist when people turn to torrents. It’s that simple.

Where things get complicated is with piracy as a protest against DRM. In principle I support it – in my eyes, nothing justifies piracy more.

If developers and publishers think PC gamers are being unreasonable in wanting our games to be stable and spyware free, then I say they’re being unreasonable in wanting us to pay for them.

Plus, DRM does NOT prevent piracy. Never has, never will. Pirated games have the DRM removed. What DRM prevents is lending, reselling and in some cases even replaying old games. You know, legal stuff. It can also conflict with firewalls and render games unplayable.

When DRM only harms those who pay for their games you can hardly blame people for seeking out an alternative.

In theory, piracy is a perfectly legitimate form of protest.

Unfortunately, in practice it doesn’t really work. While gamers, developers and publishers alike know perfectly well that piracy is a symptom of DRM and not a cause – you only have to look at the Humble Bundles to see that – devs and publishers will always use it to justify their bullshit.

So I’m going to talk about Mass Effect 3 again. It’s far from being the only relevant game but it is the most current and a product of the PC gamer’s arch nemesis: Electronic Arts.

I would pirate Mass Effect 3 in a heartbeat were it not for that fact that a) I wish to maintain some sort of moral high ground over EA and BioWare and b) this is EA we’re talking about and if I were to pirate one of their games the best case scenario for me would be to open the door to a couple of burly men with a hobbling post.

After the DRM and DLC issues came to light, Mass Effect 3 saw a lot of cancelled pre-orders and there’s no shortage of PC gamers prepared to wait it out or even forgo the finale altogether. Unfortunately, too many people either didn’t have the willpower to go without or just didn’t understand why being forced to install an unstable beta product that breaks down firewalls in order to mine your computer for personal information which its developer then sells to third party advertisers was a bad thing. So what loss in sales there has been, EA will inevitable blame on piracy and/or the PCs lack of viability as a gaming platform.

With that in mind there is a part of me that feels that I might as well go the illegal download route but I don’t want to do anything that would give EA an excuse to pretend their policies have been vindicated.

I want to play Mass Effect 3. I want EA to lose out when I do. But I don’t want to help justify EA treating their PC customers any worse than they already do.

It’s a conundrum.

Console gamers can (for now at least) stick it to EA through the used game market and indeed one legal plan for Mass Effect is to opportunistically purchase used copies of all three instalments for the Xbox when I can, on the assumption that one day I’ll own an Xbox on which to play them.

Of course if ME3 is eventually released on Steam we’ll be left wondering if that wasn’t part of EA’s master plan all along: withhold the spyware free version for as long possible and release it when we’re desperate enough to pay an exorbitant amount for it.

And the saddest part? Just watch this (the relevant part starts at 5:15 but the whole thing’s pretty depressing.). Try not to cry.

Page 1 of 11